Here we go…
In early January, rookie minister Joe Oliver — federal Minister of Natural Resources penned an open letter to Canadians, suggesting that radical environmentalists and the like were hijacking processes such as the National Energy Board hearings into the proposed Enbridge Northern exit-way Pipeline.
Here’s the CBC story from Jan.:
‘Driven by an ideological imperative’
In an interview on CBC News Network, Oliver said radicals are “a group of people who don’t take into account the facts but are driven by an ideological imperative.”
Review process should be shortened, minister says
Oliver says he thinks the environmental review process can be shorter and still protect Canada.
“Of course it’s a matter of judgment. We want to have enough time, but we don’t want to permit people to hijack the process, and that’s what’s been happening,” he said.
Last month, Oliver criticized the environmental review process as he approved French oil giant Total’s Joslyn North oilsands mine project 65 kilometres northwest of Fort McMurray, Alta. He said he wants to see the process streamlined and shortened to two years.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Well, let’s stop and take a look at this for a second, Mr. Oliver (errr… honorable)
Definition of “ideological“?
1. Of or relating to ideology.
2. Of or concerned with ideas.
Hmmm. And definition of “ideology“:
the body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group.
And curious enough, the roots of the word actually mean: originally “philosophy of the mind which derives knowledge from the senses.”
Well, OK… and definition of “imperative“?
1. absolutely necessary or required; unavoidable: ‘It is imperative that we leave.’
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
And so of all the National Energy Board hearings thus far into Enbridge’s proposed Northern Exit-way pipeline… there has been nary a peep of support, barely a twitter, rarely a squeak of ‘build it, yes’…
Now, let’s quickly look at “radical”, of which there are several definitions…
1. of or going to the root or origin; fundamental: a radical difference.2. thoroughgoing or extreme, especially as regards change from accepted or traditional forms: a radical change in the policy of a company [or country].3. favoring drastic political, economic, or social reforms: radical ideas; radical and anarchistic ideologues.4. forming a basis or foundation.5. existing inherently in a thing or person: radical defects of character.
So, I suppose Mr. Oliver, you are referring to #3 — those crazy radicals favoring drastic political, economic, or social reforms…
Let’s think about that for a second………………
Build a new oil pipeline through north-central BC where one does not currently exist..
Plow over 200+ oil supertankers along the north-central coast of BC and through Hecate Strait where nary few run now…
Does that not imply, then, that building an oil pipeline is in fact the “radical reform” socially, economically, and politically?
And so who, really, are the “radicals” here?
(Not to mention that last time I checked the current “Harper” government is rather full of the old Reform Party brethren — many of those that do not believe in Darwin’s theories or other rather ‘radical’ scientific theories that refute the good holy word…)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Let’s step forward a little to today’s headlines:
Chinese oil executives are growing frustrated with regulatory delays in plans for the Northern Gateway pipeline, even as interest in Canadian oil and gas surges in the energy-hungry country, the head of Enbridge Inc. says.
Enbridge chief executive officer Pat Daniel said despite keen interest here in Canadian oil and gas reserves, this seemingly made-in-heaven match is threatened by delays in the company’s efforts to establish a $5.5-billion, 1,177-kilometre pipeline to carry bitumen from Alberta’s oil sands to a deep sea port at Kitimat, B.C., for shipping to Asian markets.
Curious… I certainly don’t remember Mr. Harper celebrating China as a “made in heaven” match just a few short years ago as he celebrated the work of the Dalai Lama…
“They’re frustrated, as we are, in the length of time it takes,” Mr. Daniel said in an interview on the sidelines of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s mission to China. “They’re very anxious to diversify their supply, they’re very dependent on the Middle East for crude.
“[Canada] seems like the perfect match that should last a long time, but if you don’t move it along, people do lose interest. We don’t have forever,” he continued. “The fundamentals in the business can change and you must take advantage of opportunities if and when they present themselves.”
Well… actually, in fact Mr. Daniel, we do have forever… what’s the rush…?
Last I checked China has been around quite some time… some thousands and thousands of years [without Canadian bitumen].
So has the oil in the ground in Canada’s tar sands — also thousands and thousands of years… millions actually.
And, well, the longer the oil stays in the ground, the more valuable it will become… (or obsolete).
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Mr. Daniel said they hope to have approvals completed within two years and construction in three, so that oil can begin flowing by late 2016 or early 2017, despite heavy opposition from environmental groups and first nations who fear the impact of an oil spill on some of Canada’s most untouched wilderness and coastline.
Huh… seems there’s this sticky couple hundred year old issue of unsettled treaties in B.C. with First Nations, Mr. Daniel… and… well… your Enbridge team has significantly botched its community relations work in BC.
It’s not just opposition from “environmental” groups. There have been farmers, fisherfolks, unions, teachers, municipalities, mayors, and just average plumbers and carpenters and truck drivers saying: “no thanks Enbridge, no thanks China, no thanks Harper and Oliver.”
And, well, on the coast of BC they’ve been saying that for a long, long time. ’bout as far back as when little Mr. Harper was still wetting his bed.
_ _ _ _ _ _
Well, to spread the headlines around – the National Post is reporting:
…The prime minister also announced during his speech to the business forum [in China] that more than 20 commercial agreements — valued at close to $3 billion and involving nearly 50 Canadian and Chinese companies — have been signed during the trade mission to the Middle Kingdom.
“Canada has the resources, technological sophistication, and geo-strategic positioning to complement China’s economic growth strategy. And China’s growth, in turn, complements our determination to diversify our export markets,” Harper told corporate leaders.
“We expect to see similar success stories in Canadian energy exports to China, once infrastructure is in place.”
Harper has said building pipelines to the West Coast — such as the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway oilsands pipeline and a separate one for liquefied natural gas — is a national priority as Canada looks to ship its vast resources to Asia.
[funny, i think i read that correctly… “proposed”]
Enbridge CEO Pat Daniel said the commitment by the Chinese and Canadian governments for a strategic energy partnership will allow Canada to diversify its oil-and-gas export markets beyond the United States and enable China to broaden its supply base.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Hmmm. Why is Enbridge’s CEO in China with PM Harper on a deal-signing trip?
And… does the changing climate really care about complementing China’s growth strategy, or diversifying Canada’s oil markets?
And what about a National Energy Plan for Canada first — let alone looking to satisfy China’s?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Certainly, China is looking for more oil and gas from Canada, with Chinese vice-premier Li saying Thursday his country wants to increase imports of energy and natural resources from Canada.
State-owned Chinese oil and gas firms have invested more than $10 billion into Alberta’s oilsands and B.C. shale gas plays over the past couple of years alone, and the two partners expect the trend will continue.
“Canada is one of the countries with a deep energy and resource reserve. China, meanwhile, is a large and stable market,” Li, through a translator, told the business forum. He called for “more large-scale cooperation” on petroleum and minerals.
“Never before has Canada-China business cooperation been so deep-based and wide ranging,” Li added.
The Chinese leadership is also pushing for the early signing and ratification of the Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA), with Premier Wen Jiabao encouraging the two sides to further explore the feasibility of a full free-trade agreement.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
From human-rights abusers and Harper’s doghouse — to best buds and potential ‘free-trade partners’… in less than six years.
Really, Mr. Oliver, who are the radical ideologues?
Who’s ‘Driven by an ideological imperative’?
(that being definition #2 “thoroughgoing or extreme, especially as regards change from accepted or traditional forms”)
_ _ _ _ _ _
Lastly, if you’re curious about where rookie 70-year old MP Oliver came from:
…Mr. Oliver spent more than 30 years in the investment world, working at several brokerage firms before becoming executive director of the Ontario Securities Commission and then head of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada.
Do you think he, or past clients might own some Enbridge stocks?
Really, Mr. Oliver, who’s driven by the ideology — those looking to just make another buck, or those looking out for the good of the BC landscape, seascape, and greater global challenge of this little thing called “warming”…?